Sabah dan Sarawak adalah BERSTATUS NEGARA dan bukannya Negeri.

Sabah dan Sarawak adalah sebuah Negara yang MERDEKA DAN BERDAULAT yang mana kedua - dua NEGARA ini telah bersama-sama dengan Singapura dan Malaya untuk membentuk Persekutuan Malaysia pada 16 September 1963.

Happy Sabah (North Borneo) Independence Day 51 Years

Sabah or previously known as North Borneo was gained Independence Day from British on August 31, 1963. To all Sabahan, do celebrate Sabah Merdeka Day with all of your heart!

Sarawak For Sarawakian!

Sarawak stand for Sarawak! Sarawakian First. Second malaysian!

The Unity of Sabah and Sarawak

Sabah dan Sarawak adalah Negara yang Merdeka dan Berdaulat. Negara Sabah telah mencapai kemerdekaan pada 31 Ogos 1963 manakala Negara Sarawak pada 22 Julai 1963. Sabah dan Sarawak BUKAN negeri dalam Malaysia! Dan Malaysia bukan Malaya tapi adalah Persekutuan oleh tiga buah negara setelah Singapura dikeluarkan daripada persekutuan Malaysia.

Sign Petition to collect 300,000 signatures

To all Sabahan and Sarawakian... We urge you to sign the petition so that we can bring this petition to United Nations to claim our rights back as an Independence and Sovereign Country for we are the Nations that live with DIGNITY!

Decedent of Rajah Charles Brooke

Jason Desmond Anthony Brooke. The Grandson of Rajah Muda Anthony Brooke, and Great Great Grandson of Rajah Charles Brooke

A true Independence is a MUST in Borneo For Sabah and Sarawak.

Sabah (formerly known as North Borneo) and Sarawak MUST gain back its Freedom through a REAL Independence.

Tuesday, 26 January 2016

Kebenaran Rentetan Sejarah Yang Disembunyikan Telah Menerangkan Dirinya

Sebelum terbentuknya "malaysia atau persekutuan malaysia", Negara North Borneo telah diberikan kuasa wilayah oleh Ratu Permaisuri England, Victoria pada tahun 1881 untuk menjalankan segala urusan rasmi dibawah pengendalian North Borneo Chartered Company.  Manakala Negara Sarawak pula sudah berada dibawah pemerintahan Rajah Sarawak, James Brooke sejak 1841. Pada 1888, ketiga-tiga negara Borneo iaitu Negara North Borneo, Negara Sarawak dan Negara Brunei telah bernaung (Protectorate States) dibawah British bagi melindungi negara mereka daripada serangan luar.

Keadaan ini semua berubah selepas Perang Dunia ke-2 yang mana status Negara North Borneo dan Negara Sarawak telah diturunkan menjadi "Tanah Jajahan Makhota British (Crown Colony of British)" daripada status "Tanah Naungan (Protectorate State)". Dalam erti kata lain, pentadbiran dikedua-dua negara Borneo sebelum ini terletak dibawah NBCC dan Brooke, kini ia ditadbir terus daripada pejabat pentadbiran tanah jajahan di London.

Seperti yang anda dapat lihat pada gambar Chapter 1 diatas, itulah keadaan yang sebenarnya berlaku.

Apa yang menyedihkan ialah apabila malaya telah mempengaruhi keputusan British dalam memberikan Kemerdekaan kepada bangsa Negara Sabah dan bangsa Negara Sarawak. Pemimpin-pemimpin Borneo telah ditipu, dikecam dan diugut untuk bersetuju menyertai malaysia. Dijanjikan untuk diberikan kemerdekaan selepas terbentuknya malaysia rupa-rupanya apa yang menjadi mimpi ngeri pada peringkat awal malaysia ini dikhabarkan sebenarnya telah menjadi nyata. Pembentukkan malaysia ini sebenarnya bukanlah sebuah pembentukkan "persekutuan baru" mahupun "negara baru" tetapi ia adalah lebih kepada "Pembesaran Tanah Persempadanan Kuasa Politik malaya". Ini jelas dapat dibuktikan melalui pendedahan pihak kami mengenai status kedudukan keahlian malaya dalam United Nations (UN).

Negara North Borneo dan Negara Sarawak berserta dengan Negara Singapore ketika membentuk malaysia masih lagi berstatus "Tanah Jajahan British". Status tersebut hanya termansuh selepas terbentuknya malaysia pada 16 September 1963 yang sepatutnya dijadualkan pada 31 Ogos 1963.

Apa yang menyedihkan ialah Negara Sabah, Negara Sarawak dan Negara Singapore telah ditipu namun kerana kebijaksanaan pemimpin negara Singapore, mereka berjaya melepaskan diri daripada cengkaman penjajahan malaya yang bertopengkan malaysia pada tahuan 1965 dan lantas menjadi negara yang benar-benar merdeka daripada malaysia. Sementara itu, negara Sabah dan negara Sarawak yang sememangnya berstatus negara dan mempunyai kuasa yang sama dengan malaya telah dinafikan malah diturunkan status menjadi negeri. Pemimpin-pemimpinnya telah diperkudakan, dipermainkan, dipolitikkan malah dilagakan agar tiada perpaduan dikalangan mereka agar membolehkan diri mereka dimanipulasikan demi kepentingan politik malaya.

Sehingga kini, keadaan ini masih lagi sama namun setelah kewujudan pihak kami, SSKM yang kini sudah bergerak melalui SSU-UK, malaya kian terketar-ketar kakinya kerana ditelanjangkan segala tipu helah mereka. Apa yang pihak kami dapat lihat ialah malu bukan lagi menjadi isu kepada mereka tetapi lebih kepada mengekalkan kelangsungan kuasa politik malaya mereka di tanah Borneo ini. Mereka berusaha untuk memastikan kuasa politik mereka tidak terlepas daripada cengkaman genggaman mereka. Atas sebab itu mengapa sejumlah pemimpin-pemimpin Borneo telah diserapkan didalam pentadbiran kerajaan persekutuan dibawah kepimpinan najib. Selain untuk mendapat sokongan, ia juga adalah bertujuan untuk meredakan sentimen perpisahan ini dengan menggunakan pemimpin-pemimpin Borneo ini untuk bercakap bagi pihak malaya.

Kebodohan malaya ialah mereka beranggapan bahawa rakyat negara Sabah dan rakyat negara Sarawak akan diam namun sehingga kini, keadaan dan sentimen ini menjadi semakin kuat dan semakin difahami tentang mengapa Perpisahan ini mesti dilakukan.

Kuasa Kedaulatan Perundangan dan Kemerdekaan Negara Sabah dan Negara Sarawak sebenarnya berada didalam genggaman kerajaan malaya namun kedua-dua negara ini masih mempunyai kuasa autonomi dalam banyak perkara yang membataskan penguasaan malaya keatas dua negara Borneo ini.

Pentadbiran Negara Sabah dan Negara Sarawak yang sebelum ini dari London kini berada di Kuala Lumpur ataupun dengan lebih tepat Putrajaya. Namun malaya masih tidak boleh sewenang-wenangnya mencampuri urusan pentadbiran Borneo kerana terdapat perkara-perkara yang bukan dibawah bidang kuasa mereka. Tetapi apabila dilihat secara halus sejak dahulu lagi diawal pembentukan malaysia ini, malaya tidak pernah berhenti untuk menyelinap masuk untuk mencampuri pentadbiran politk di kedua-dua negara. Akhirnya negara Sabah kini telah jatuh didalam cengkaman genggaman mereka melalui kuasa politik parti umno yang mendominasi bn Sabah. umno adalah simbol penguasaan malaya di negara Sabah dan perkara ini berlaku kerana kebodohan pemimpin-pemimpin Sabah yang gilakan pangkat, nama, kekayaan. Mereka-mereka ini semua berada didalam umno dan golongan inilah yang menjahanamkan bangsa negara Sabah.

Sarawak yang juga merupakan komponen bn namun mereka didominasi oleh parti-parti tempatan dan malaya tidak mampu mencampuri secara langsung pentadbiran politik mereka dan keadaan ini jauh lebih baik daripada keadaan politik negara Sabah.

Persoalan yang perlu dijawab dengan jujur sekarang ialah adakah bangsa negara Sabah dan bangsa negara Sarawak hanya mahu merelakan semua ini berlaku tanpa sebarang usaha untuk berjuang? Jikalau jawapannya ialah tidak, maka perkara utama yang perlu anda lakukan ialah "Pastikan Kuasa Politik Negara Sabah dan Negara Sarawak berada dibawah cengkaman genggaman parti-parti tempatan. Sama ada mereka adalah parti pihak kerajaan mahupun pembangkang asalkan mereka parti tempatan, itu mesti menjadi keutamaan anda semua."

Selebihnya pihak kami akan maklumkan dikemudian hari.

Sebarkan info ini...

Perlukah SSU-UK Memohon Maaf Kepada Datuk James Ligunjang?

Pihak kami telah dimaklumkan bahawa Datuk James Ligunjang telah menghubungi anggota T4 dan meminta mereka menyampaikan mesej kepada Pejuang Kebangsaan Borneo, Doris Jones agar membuat permohonan maaf atas fitnah yang dilemparkan keatasnya.

Ini jawapan pihak kami kepadanya:

Jikalau anda, Datuk James Ligunjang yakin bahawa kenyataan RASMI pihak kami merupakan fitnah semata-mata sehingga menjejaskan imej dan kredibiliti anda sebagai seorang yang mempunyai pengaruh, anda boleh terus berhubung secara langsung kepada Doris Jones tanpa perlu melalui orang tengah.

Anda juga mempunyai hak untuk membuat penafian secara terbuka didalam akhbar mahupun didalam berita portal online tentang dakwaan pihak kami terhadap anda. Tidak perlulah melakukan secara tersembunyi kerana ia hanya akan menguatkan spekulasi yang kini sedang menjadi perbualan umum rakyat negara Sabah.

Bukan niat kami untuk memalukan atau menjatuhkan imej mana-mana pihak namun perkara ini adalah serius dan mesti didedahkan agar semua pihak peka dan sedar tentang keadaan yang sebenar sedang berlaku dalam perjuangan membongkarkan penipuan malaya dalam pembentukan malaysia ini.

Pihak kami menghargai usaha Datuk Anifah Aman kerana membantu pihak kami namun tindakan bantuan tersebut adalah tidak bersesuaian dengan keperluannya. Ia menimbulkan pelbagai tanda tanya yang menguatkan dakwaan pihak kami terhadap permainan pihak-pihak tertentu untuk mendiamkan perkara ini.

Bukan duit dan pangkat yang menjadi perhitungan dalam perjuangan ini tetapi mencari Kebenaran adalah Tunjang dan Teras kepada misi pihak kami.

Sebarkan...

Monday, 25 January 2016

Kenyataan RASMI SSKM-SSU(UK) berhubung dengan Campurtangan Datuk James Ligunjang dan Datuk Anifah Aman Dalam Kes Makhamah T4

Salam Sejahtera, Salam Tahun Baru 2016 dan Salam Bangsa Negara Sabah dan Bangsa Negara Sarawak yang Berjiwa Merdeka dan Berdaulat. Saya Doris Jones mewakili Kumpulan Sosial didalam Facebook dengan nama Sabah Sarawak Keluar Malaysia (SSKM) yang kini sudah berdaftar secara SAH dengan nama NGO Sabah Sarawak Union - United Kingdom (SSU-UK) melalui bidang kuasa Perundangan Kerajaan United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, ingin membuat kenyataan rasmi berhubung dengan Campurtangan Datuk James Ligunjang dan Datuk Anifah Aman Dalam Kes Makhamah T4. 

Pertama [1], ingin saya memaklumkan kepada anda semua bahawa pihak kami telah dimaklumkan sebelum oleh Peguam T4 ini bahawa kes makhamah yang membabitkan 4 orang pejuang (Tuaran 4 - T4) Kebangsaan Negara Sabah akan ditundakan (dari tahun lepas) kepada 25 Januari sehingga 27 Januari 2016. Namun, apa yang menjadi tanda tanya ialah ketika waktu pagi mereka tiba di makhamah untuk menghadiri pendakwaan keatas mereka, pihak makhamah telah memaklumkan kepada mereka bahawa tiada sebarang sesi makhamah akan berlangsung pada hari ini sehingga 27 Januari 2016. Perkara ini adalah sesuatu yang mengejutkan semua pihak kerana mereka tidak dimaklumkan awal mahupun melalui surat rasmi tentang perkara ini.

Kedua [2], pada hari ahad (24 Januari 2016), empat orang yang didakwa dibawah akta hasutan ini yang juga merupakan Pejuang Kebangsaan Negara Sabah telah dihubungi oleh Datuk James Ligunjang. Melalui mesej yang telah diterima, beliau memaklumkan kepada mereka berempat untuk tidak payah menghadiri perbicaraan pada 25 Januari 2016 iaitu keesokannya. Mereka hanya perlu hadir pada 27 Januari 2016 bersama dengan penjamin masing-masing berserta dengan duit jaminan untuk duduk semeja dengan Datuk Anifah Aman bagi mengucapkan penghargaan terima kasih. Menurut Datuk James Ligunjang, Datuk Anifah Aman telah membantu untuk menggugurkan kes tersebut. Persoalan yang menjadi tanda tanya ialah mengapa Datuk James Ligunjang dapat mengetahui perkara ini lebih awal daripada peguam T4 ini? Apakah sebenarnya peranan dan kuasa Datuk James Ligunjang dalam memberikan mesej seperti ini sedangkan hakim John Wayne Daly dan peguam T4 belum lagi mengeluarkan sebarang kenyataan rasmi? Ia menampakkan seolah-olah Datuk James Ligunjang mencampuri bidang kuasa dan peranan Peguam dan Makhamah? Mengapa Datuk Anifah Aman mencampuri kes ini dan meminta ia digugurkan menurut Datuk James Ligunjang? Adakah tindakan dan perbuatan yang dilakukan oleh Datuk James Ligunjang dan Datuk Anifah Aman ini akan menyebabkan Pejuang-Pejuang Kebangsaan Negara Sabah terhutang budi? Apakah justifikasi yang rasional untuk mereka berasa terhutan budi?

Ketiga [3], Datuk James Ligunjang tidak menyatakan secara jelas tentang berapakah jumlah wang yang perlu disediakan dan untuk apakah duit tersebut? Tiada arahan mahupun keputusan rasmi yang dikeluarkan oleh pihak makhamah tentang penyediaan penjamin dan duit jaminan tersebut keatas mereka. Pihak kami merasakan bahawa terdapat satu permainan dalam yang telah dilakukan oleh pihak-pihak tertentu sehingga menyebabkan pihak makhamah mengosongkan sesi makhamah pada hari ini, 25 Januari sehingga 27 Januari 2016.

Keempat [4], untuk setakat ini, pihak kami ingin menyatakan bahawa tuduhan keatas empat orang Pejuang Kebangsaan Negara Sabah dibawah Akta Hasutan 1948 adalah tidak sah kerana tiada sebarang keputusan rasmi yang dijatuhkan keatas mereka. Melalui perkara ini, adakah anda semua sudah mampu melihat dengan jelas tentang kebenaran perjuangan yang dibawakan oleh pihak kami melalui gerakan NGO Sabah Sarawak Union-United Kingdom (SSU-UK)? Jikalau pihak kami berada ditempat yang salah, bukankah ini akan memudahkan pendakwaan keatas T4? Sebaliknya perkara seperti itu tidak berlaku kerana apa yang diperjuangkan adalah benar dan sahih.

Pihak intelek antarabangsa sedang mengikuti perkembangan kes T4 ini dan apabila mereka mengetahui akan keadaan kes ini yang digugurkan, apakah ia akan memberikan imej yang positif keatas status kedudukan "Malaysia"? Bagi pihak kami, ia menjadi sumber kekuatan yang sudah dijangka dan ini akan menguatkan lagi momentum perjuangan untuk bangsa Negara Sabah dan bangsa Negara Sarawak berpisah daripada kuasa cengkaman penjajahan malaya yang bertopengkan "Malaysia". 

Cahaya Kebenaran sudah jelas menerangi kegelapan yang selama ini menyelubungi bangsa Borneo. Cahaya ini juga akan terus menelanjangkan penipuan-penipuan dan pengkhianatan yang selama ini dilakukan oleh kerajaan Malaya keatas bangsa dan negara Borneo dari Negara Sabah dan Negara Sarawak.

Doris Jones

Sunday, 24 January 2016

‘Most of the data in fake MyKads come from Sabah’

Source familiar with issue of fake MyKads says syndicates use data from Sabah Mykads.

PETALING JAYA: Most fake MyKads produced by syndicates for foreigners used data from MyKads issued in Sabah.

This is the shocking revelation made by a source in the Immigration Department when asked to comment on a recent joint operation with the National Registration Department (NRD) on fake MyKads in Pahang.

The source said that the data in fake MyKads almost always came from Sabah as it was an entry point for foreigners into the country.

“These syndicates have been around for ages and they are very advanced in their methods,” said the source, adding that this was to avoid detection by the authorities.

“This is where Immigration officers come into play, we observe their movements or accents and then check their MyKads against NRD records, as on the face of it, the fake MyKads look like the real deal.”

The source said that the NRD would have more details about the fake MyKads as it was the agency in charge of issuing these.

Meanwhile when contacted, Immigration Department deputy director-general Sakib Kusmi declined to comment on the sources’ claims, saying only that the data in the MyKads came from various sources.

“The syndicates can get the tools they need to make the fake MyKads easily in the market and online.
“As for the data, they can get these from leaked data from credit card companies and stolen or lost MyKads,” he said.

On Thursday, the New Straits Times reported on the joint operation in Balok, Pahang in which the authorities discovered fake MyKads were being sold for as low as RM200.

Illegal immigrants detained with the fake MyKads claimed to have bought them from a few syndicates operating in Kuala Lumpur, Perak and Sabah.

One of those detained came from Mindanao, in southern Philippines and bought his fake MyKad from Perak containing the MyKad data of a man from Tuaran, Sabah.

Some 70 illegal immigrants from southern Philippines were detained in the operation.

When contacted, an NRD spokesperson said they would need time to verify the claims made by the source and would respond to FMT’s queries soon.

Monday, 18 January 2016

Kenyataan Rasmi SSU-UK terhadap Kerjasama dengan SSPR

Saya Doris Jones selaku Pengerusi Sabah Sarawak Union-United Kingdom (SSU-UK) ingin memberikan kenyataan rasmi berhubung dengan kerjasama diantara SSU-UK dengan SSPR.

Pertama, saya telah melakukan sehabis baik untuk berusaha untuk menyelesaikan konflik yang timbul diantara SSU-UK dan SSPR melalui beberapa cara namun usaha tersebut menemui jalan buntu apabila niat saya untuk menyelesaikan konflik ini telah disalahtafsirkan.

Kedua, pucuk kepimpinan SSPR telah memutuskan untuk memberhentikan hubungan untuk terus berada dibawah naungan SSU-UK atas sebab-sebab tertentu dan keputusan tersebut dihormati sepenuhnya dengan niat yang baik.

Ketiga, walaupun hubungan ini telah berakhir pada 18 Januari 2016 sejak bermulanya naungan pada 16 Januari 2015, pihak SSU-UK tidak melihat perkara ini sebagai satu halangan untuk terus menjalinkan kerjasama dengan SSPR dimasa hadapan jikalau terdapat keperluan. Pihak kami juga sentiasa bersedia untuk memberikan khidmat pandangan, nasihat atau apa-apa yang diperlukan jikalau diperlukan oleh pihak SSPR.

Keempat, pihak SSU-UK ingin memanjatkan permohonan maaf secara ikhlas atas segala permasalahan yang timbul sepanjang SSPR berada dibawah naungan SSU-UK. 

Kelima, isu T9 yang melibatkan ahli SSPR akan menjadi tanggungjawab SSU-UK dan pihak kami akan memastikan bahawa anggota SSPR yang terlibat akan mendapat perlindungan yang sewajarnya dalam aspek perundangan.

Keenam, pihak kami juga ingin memohon agar pihak SSPR menyerahkan semua kertas petisyen sama ada dalam bentuk softcopy atau hardcopy kepada wakil SSU-UK atau mana-mana individu yang akan diberikan kepercayaan untuk mengambilnya bagi menghormati keputusan SSPR.

Ketujuh, segala sumbangan dan aktiviti yang dilakukan oleh SSPR bersama-sama dengan SSU-UK akan diabadikan dalam rekod perjuangan pihak kami bagi tujuan dokumentasi agar generasi masa hadapan dapat merujuk segala bentuk aktiviti dan kerjasama yang terjalin sepanjang tempoh hubungan ini berlangsung. 

Kelapan dan terakhir, ingin pihak SSU-UK panjatkan doa dan harapan agar semoga SSPR terus aktif dan bertenaga dalam berjuang untuk rakyat negara Sabah khususnya yang berada di daerah Ranau. 

Salam Hormat dan Salam Berjuang saya ucapkan kepada semua ahli-ahli SSPR.

Doris Jones.
18 Januari 2016

Friday, 15 January 2016

Kenapa 3 Empayar Kuno ( Sri Vijaya , Mataram dan Kadiri ) gagal untuk menakluki Pulau Borneo?

Semasa Zaman Merong Mahawangsa atau Zaman Langkasuka.. Tahukah anda bahawa Tanah Malaya adalah asalnya daripada Kerajaan Kedah .

Empayar Kedah menguasai seluruh Tanah Melayu .Sebelum kedatangan Islam dahulu Masyarakat Melayu adalah menganuti Agama Hindu.Tanah Melayu adalah sebahagian Kerajaan Empayar Sri Vijaya yang meliputi Sumatera , Jawa , Indonesia sekarang.

Tiga Kerajaan iaitu Sri Vijaya , Mataram dan Kadiri berebut untuk menguasai Borneo dan Celebes tetapi apabila sebaik sahaja tentera sri vijaya sampai di borneo dan dikatakan tidak sampai dua hari bermalam di hutan borneo keesokkan paginya tentera mereka semua tidak bernyawa dan paling mengerikan semuanya mati tanpa kepala.

Bergitu Juga dengan tentera empaya Mataram dan Kadiri yang mencuba nasib utk menakluki Borneo tetapi mendapat bala seperti mana tentera Sri Vijaya.. dimana tentera mereka mati dengan kepala hilang dipotong .. sejak itu Pulau Borneo Amat digeruni dan ditakuti oleh mana-mana empayar di sekitar Nusantara dan hingga dikenali sebagai Pulau Pemburu Kepala.

Para Pahlawan dayak yang sentiasa menjaga Borneo dari Jajahan Luar.

Pulau Borneo mempunyai Bala Tentera iaitu Empayar Dayak yang berani dan turut diceritakan 'ajaib' dan mampu menyelinap di sekitar paya , hutan serta mampu lesap dan tangkas.

Tentera Dayak dengan Kepala Musuh yang dipenggal.

Dianggarkan Ribuan Bala Tentera Srivijaya mati dengan keadaan mengerikan dan kesemua Tentera Sri Vijaya hilang kepala bergitu juga dengan Serangan Taklukan daripada Empaya Kediri dan Empaya Mataram yang mencuba nasib meluaskan jajahan ke Borneo.


Thursday, 14 January 2016

NGO Naungan SSU-UK

Kepada mana-mana NGO yang berada dibawah naungan SSU-UK, ingin pihak kami sampaikan mesej ini bahawa jikalau terdapat sebarang perselisihan faham yang berlaku, sila atasi masalah tersebut secara baik dan damai. 

Jikalau perkara-perkara yang timbul tidak mampu diselesaikan dengan baik sehingga membawa kepada persengketaan, dan menyebabkan perjuangan asal mana-mana NGO yang bernaung dibawah SSU-UK sudah tidak konsisten dan hilang arah tujuan, maka adalah dibawah tanggungjawab pihak SSU-UK, mempunyai hak dan kuasa untuk membatalkan kuasa naungan tersebut kepada mana-mana NGO dibawah SSU-UK. 

Untuk mengelak daripada perkara yang tidak diingini berlaku, sila hubungi pucuk kepimpinan SSU-UK untuk menjelaskan perkara yang sebenar agar penyelesaian yang bijaksana dapat diambil demi kepentingan bersama.

Thursday, 7 January 2016

2015 tough but Sabah becoming more resilient, says Yong

Kota Kinabalu: Former Chief Minister Datuk Yong Teck Lee said occurrence on a number of events had made 2015 tough but it may be a blessing in disguise as Sabah is becoming more resilient.

In an environment of economic downturn, he said Sabahans like most Malaysians, would have to tighten their belts further in weathering the coming year.

Be that as it may, he said out of the top 10 events that have an impact on Sabah's future, eight are positive in the long run.

"The emergence of non-party activists fighting for Sabah's rights, like Sabah Sarawak Keluar Malaysia (SSKM), the author of the book Queen's Obligations, MOSIK and other NGOs is a sure sign that ordinary Sabahans are taking up the fight for Sabah's rights.

"The sedition trial of the 'Tuaran 4' will bring forth many grievances of Sabahans. Similarly, the claim for the '40 per cent entitlement from the Federal net revenue led by a senior federal minister with activists, professionals and the local opposition, shows a non-partisan unity of fellow Sabahans fighting for Sabah.

"The coming together of Sabah local parties under the Gabungan Sabah (United Sabah Alliance) and the commemoration of Merdeka at Kundasang and Oath Stone at Keningau has struck the right chord with the people's desire to see a united Sabah opposition," he said.

Yong, who is also Sabah Progressive Party (SAPP) President, said this in his statement on Tuesday. He said the Ranau earthquake, though tragic, has displayed the heroism of ordinary Sabahans, the mountain guides, and the collective consciousness of Sabahans as the earthquake has made Sabahans more self-confident, self-reliant and proud of being Sabahans.

At the same time, he said the weakening of Malayan parties, especially the internal turmoil within Umno, and Umno-PAS co-operation will weaken Barisan Nasional (BN) in Sabah.

"Issues of the Goods and Service Tax (GST), 1MDB and financial weaknesses of Malaya have revealed to Sabahans that we have to save Sabah from Malaya.

"The demise of Pakatan Rakyat is causing the Malayan parties' influence in Sabah to wane. Racial and religious polarisation in Malaya, racial incidents like Low Yat, have eroded the confidence of Sabahans towards the Malayan model of national unity," he said.

Yong said Sarawak's reawakening as a powerful voice for Sarawak autonomy has energised Sabah's movement for autonomy.

Similarly, he said the Johor Sultan's outspokenness and unexpected hints of leaving Malaysia, makes Sabah feel no longer lonely.

Further ashore, at the United Kingdom, Yong said the victory of the Scottish National Party in defeating both the Labour Party and the ruling Conservative Party, in a parliamentary democracy similar to ours, show the people of Sabah a way forward.

"The international superpower play going on at the South China Sea will play out in the decades to come.

"Knowing China's history, China's military might is to prevent any war from breaking out in the first place. Hence, the maritime Silk Road concept and the 60 billion dollar Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank are soft strategies of China that can benefit Malaysia.

Depending on how Malaysia protects its sovereign interests, there is a silver lining in the South China Sea issue," he said on international issue that concerns the State and Malaysia.

On economic aspect, Yong said the Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPPA), like all trade accords, will have its pros and cons for all the countries involved.

"As TPPA will open up a huge market for Sabah's palm oil, our economy and State revenues will benefit. These benefits will help offset the strengthening of the US Dollar due to the rise of US interest rates.

"Sabah has too small an industrial base and intellectual properties to be affected by TPPA. In the long run, TPPA will force the Malaysian (and Sabah) economy to be more efficient.

This is like the International Tropical Timber Agreement 1994 which had forced Sabah to adopt Sustainable Forest Management by 2000 with long term benefits.

"Although the fall of crude oil prices from 100 USD to 35 USD will affect Sabah's revenues, the drop in oil prices has eased the upward pressures on inflation," he said.

The low point for Sabah in 2015 has to be the tragic beheading of the Sarawakian tourist who was kidnapped from Sandakan, Yong said.

"The beheading brings home to Sabahans the reality of gruesome violence that we read about only in international news.

"The feared 'perfect storm', a combination of all the armed groups in the Philippines with hostile intention towards Sabah, will test our security forces to its limits," he said.

In an environment of general lawlessness, Yong said the kidnap for ransom gangs and official corruption, the failure of the peace process in Southern Philippines will undoubtedly pose serious challenges for Sabah.

"This has been admitted openly by the police. The failure of the Philippines to honour its peace agreement with Bangsamoro to pass the Bangsamoro Basic Law by this year will, as forewarned by the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF), lead to terrorism and more violence. "This is already happening as amplified by the latest execution of villagers by extremist groups who mimic Middle Eastern 'fear factor' tactics.

"Furthermore, the Philippines' 'Sabah Claim' is taking centre stage in the Philippines elections campaign as high profile candidates are openly campaigning for the "Sabah Claim".

Their election results in May 2016 will have a strong bearing on our relations with the Philippines," he said. All in all, Yong said 2015 has been a tough year for Sabahans but it has a silver lining of longer term benefits arising from our growing resilience as a people.

Source: Daily Express

While Sarawak speaks up on autonomy, Sabah is mute

It is the activists in Sabah who not only led the way once on autonomy but pushed their counterparts in Sarawak into action.

KOTA KINABALU: Sabah opposition strongman Jeffery Kitingan has expressed dismay that while Sarawak has been growing increasingly vociferous on the return of Full Autonomy to the state, the Sabah Government appears to be more muted and apparently was willing to settle for the transfer of administrative management from the Federal Government.

“It was the activists in Sabah who not only led the way once on autonomy but pushed their counterparts in Sarawak into action.

“The Sarawak Government has officially recognised 22 July 1963 as Independence Day, and declared that the 1963 Federation was an equal one made up of Sabah, Sarawak and Malaya.”

Sarawak Chief Minister Adenan Satem, added Jeffrey who is also Bingkor Assemblyman and Star Sabah Chief, pushed Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak on this matter. The latter has since agreed that the state should have its Full Autonomy returned to it. “Najib has instructed the Chief Secretary to commence talks with the Sarawak Government on the devolution of powers to the Sarawak Government.

“In Sabah, nothing of that sort is happening since the state government is controlled by Umno and other component parties in the ruling Barisan Nasional (BN) coalition are subservient.”

Sabahans, said Jeffrey, cannot look at Sarawak and take things for granted. “They need to wake up from their slumber.

“Nothing will be handed to them on a silver platter.”

Jeffrey, who is also United Borneo Front (UBF) Chairman, was announcing that the five-year-old NGO will make solidarity the buzzword in the run-up to the 14th General Election in 2018. “In Solidarity, We Shall Triumph.”

He urged MPs from Sabah and Sarawak to realise that if 11 of them now hold positions in the Federal Cabinet, it was because of the kingmaker status that their homelands have enjoyed since 2008. “The 57 MPs from Borneo decide who forms the government in Putrajaya.”

“BN’s 87 MPs from Malaya or Pakatan’s 79 MPs there cannot on their own form the Federal Government since they have less than the 112 seats needed to meet the threshold requirement.”

The Sabah lawmaker said that he agreed with Opposition Parliamentary Leader Wan Azizah Wan Ismail that the 57 MPs in Borneo, 47 of whom are from BN and 10 from the Opposition, should get together and form their own Borneo Block in Parliament. “That would be the way to get the rights of Sabah and Sarawak restored. They need to speak with one voice, and engage in one struggle for the return of Full Autonomy.”

“The people of Sabah and Sarawak have already realised that they should stand together against Putrajaya in order to win back their rights.”

Jeffrey’s Star Sabah and other local opposition parties have since formed the United Sabah Alliance (USA) with the theme, “USA menang, Sabah Sarawak senang.” (USA wins, Sabah and Sarawak will find it easier).

Putrajaya punca hubungan dengan Sarawak renggang – Tun M

Beliau juga mengaku sukar meramalkan siapa yang akan memerintah Sarawak selepas PRN yang dijangka Mac ini.

PETALING JAYA: Kerajaan Persekutuan pimpinan Perdana Menteri, Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak harus dipersalahkan di atas keretakan hubungan yang berlaku antara Semenanjung dan Sarawak.

Mantan Perdana Menteri, Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad berkata, senario yang berlaku sekarang seolah-olah menunjukkan Sarawak bukan sebahagian daripada Malaysia.

“Ia berpunca dari kelemahan Kerajaan Persekutuan,” katanya dalam satu wawancara eksklusif bersama FMT.

Beliau juga mengaku sukar untuk meramalkan siapa yang akan memerintah Sarawak selepas Pilihan Raya Negeri (PRN) yang dijangka pada Mac ini.

“Saya tidak tahu bagaimana pendapat orang Sarawak. Tetapi kita nampak semakin renggang, dan masing-masing bercakap pasal Sarawak. Seolah-olah Sarawak ini tidak ada dalam Malaysia kerana lebih kepada Sarawak,” ujarnya.

Jika keadaan itu berterusan, Dr Mahathir berkata, negeri-negeri lain akan mempersoalkan mengenai layanan yang diterima terhadap negeri Sarawak.

“Kalau kita macam itu, Johor pula hendak lebih untuk Johor. Jika macam itu, kita akan berpecah. Bila berpecah, negara ini akan hancur,” katanya lagi.

Sejak akhir-akhir ini, kerajaan Sarawak pimpinan Ketua Menteri, Tan Sri Adenan Satem banyak membuat keputusan yang bertentangan dengan Kerajaan Persekutuan seperti mengiktiraf Sijil Peperiksaan Bersepadu (UEC) sebagai syarat untuk berkhidmat dalam perkhidmatan awam di negeri itu.

Selain itu, Adenan enggan mengubah dasar imigresen bagi memelihara keharmonian masyarakat berbilang kaum di negeri itu selain menjadi ketua kerajaan negeri yang paling lantang mengkritik keputusan Kerajaan Persekutuan dan Najib.

Sunday, 20 December 2015

Lajim set to ‘lock horns’ with PKR headquarters

The feedback from headquarters is that the local chapters in Borneo should take “baby steps” in seeking greater autonomy from national leaders in the peninsula.

KOTA KINABALU: Sabah Opposition Leader and the head of the local chapter of the peninsula-based PKR, Lajim Ukin, who defected from the Barisan Nasional (BN) before the last General Election, has thrown down the gauntlet with party headquarters. This follows the realisation that the rural voters in Orang Asal country refuse to have anything to do with the party.

“Many Sabahans think that just as in Umno Sabah, PKR Sabah leaders have little say on how the state should be run.”

Taking a leaf from former PKR vice-president Jeffrey Kitingan, Lajim is demanding that PKR Sabah and Sarawak be allowed to have their own annual congresses separate from that held in the peninsula by the headquarters.

“We don’t want people going around saying that we are a parti Malaya and that we have no business being in Borneo,” said Lajim.

“We want to dispel the notion that we are puppets like the BN component parties in Sabah who are puppets of Umno and like the puppets in Umno Sabah.”

Lajim was explaining to the local media the stir he created in Shah Alam recently when he turned up with a 270-strong delegation from Sabah with placards demanding that Sabah and Sarawak be allowed to hold their own separate annual congresses.

“This is in line with the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63),” said Lajim. “We must have autonomy from the headquarters.”

“If we can hold our own annual Congress, it will help us cut down on expenses travelling to the peninsula on party matters.”

He claims that the party headquarters may agree, in principle, that the Sabah and Sarawak chapters of the party have more autonomy. However, the feedback from the headquarters is that the local chapters in Borneo should take “baby steps” in seeking greater autonomy from the national leaders in the peninsula.

Lajim, who was appointed by jailed de facto Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim, isn’t sure whether the PKR Sabah Chief should be elected.

Jeffrey left PKR when his demand that the PKR Sabah leader be elected was rejected by Anwar. The de facto PKR Chief also rejected Jeffrey’s demand that he make good his promise to honour the Tambunan Declaration which includes MA63.

PKR won seven state seats in 2013 but three of the lawmakers have since defected from the party. The party also holds the Penampang parliamentary seat.

The peninsula-based opposition parties in Sabah, as in Sarawak, are bogged down by local opposition parties splitting votes when it comes to election time. The peninsula-based opposition parties in Borneo claim that local opposition parties are being sponsored by BN, a charge which they have denied.

Saturday, 12 December 2015

Sindiket bn-umno melalui Jabatan Ketua Menteri Sabah

Ini yang dinamakan Resit Pengenalan JKM yang Dikeluarkan Oleh Jabatan Ketua Menteri Untuk Diberikan Kepada PTI yang masuk ke Sabah secara HARAM. Untuk Pengetahuan anda semua Resit ini lah yang memberi jaminan kepada Rakyat Filipina yang lari dan masuk secara haram, tinggal bebas di Sabah tanpa rasa takut untuk dicekup oleh Pihak Berkuasa..pernah terjadi dimana suatu operasi dijalankan pemegang Resit ini dibebaskan kerana mendapat Jaminan daripada 'orang kuat SABAH'( guess who ) sedangkan kategori yang disahkan sebagai dokumen pengenalan adalah kad pengenalan dan pasport..alahai...para pemimpin sedarlah anda telah menjual Negeri anda sendiri 


**Dokumen yang dikeluarkan kepada rakyat Filipina iaitu resit pengenalan drpd Jabatan Ketua Menteri untuk menukarkan ia kepada kad IMM13 seterusnya ditukarkan kepada kad pengenalan taraf penduduk tetap..anehnya resit pengenalan sementara yang dikeluarkan kepada rakyat Filipina cuma sekeping kertas yang tidak ada sebarang ciri keselamatan dan dikeluarkan kepada PENDATANG TANPA IZIN ini..boleh menukarkan ia kepada kad IMM13..Sedangkan ramai diantara mereka baru 2 minggu 'berlari' dari negara mereka untuk mndapatkan kertas bodoh ini..untuk pengetahuan anda semua ramai antara mereka ini mempunyai anak-anak yang bekerja di Jabatan Imigresen Malaysia khususnya di Sabah dan mempunyai pelbagai peringkat jawatan dari bawahan sehinggalah atasan (sejarah ibu bapa daripada Filipina mempunyai status penduduk tetap,masih memiliki IMM13..anak status warganegara)..**

Kredit to : Wartawan bebas

Source: 1 Suara Sabah

Thursday, 10 December 2015

‘Not wrong to revisit Malaysia Agreement’

IT is not wrong for the state to revisit what its forefathers have agreed to when the Malaysia Agreement was penned on July 9, 1963.

Assistant Minister of Housing Datuk Abdul Karim Hamzah said there were various factors that ought to be looked into especially when Sarawak attained independence through Malaysia more than 50 years ago.

“What they have agreed to at that time, what safeguards the state has got, whether these terms and conditions they have agreed to at that moment of time…were they followed through by the leaders of post Malaysia after the leaders that helmed this beloved nation of ours through the years?

“These are natural questions that come to us especially now with the increase in social media where people are able to access information easier and with a population with a good eduction background, there’s a lot of questions being asked,” he said in his debate to support the motion calling on the state government to be fully committed in safeguarding the special interest of the state which was tabled by Land Development Minister Tan Sri Datuk Amar Dr James Masing at the State Legislative Assembly yesterday.

Abdul Karim (BN Asajaya), who seconded the motion, said Sarawakians had experienced many levels of unhappiness throughout the years on issues concerning the rate of infrastructure such as the condition of schools, hospitals, clinics, roads, electricity and clean water supplies in the state, and the insufficient funding given by the federal government among others.

“There is also unhappiness of certain policies such as the usage of English, the use of the word ‘Allah’, and the right to practise one’s faith through the years as well as unhappiness over erosions of the rights of our territory especially on the ‘continental shelf’ which even before we formed Malaysia, are recognised as ours.”

“I won’t go into the very details on what are the areas that have been eroded but suffice for me to say that some of these matters have been highlighted by Our Right Honourable Chief Minister (Datuk Patinggi Tan Sri Adenan Satem) in his speeches across the state, in Peninsular Malaysia as well as by members of this august House,” he said.

Abdul Karim also said it was enlightening that the state government had set up several committees to discuss these issues with the federal government.

“It is enlightening to see that the state government is looking into this and we have got our own way of trying to address this problem so it will be a win-win situation for the state and the nation.

“The answers to these have not come about but slowly, we can see that the federal government is giving what we have requested for such as the (Pan Borneo) Highway, which is already undergoing construction now in Teluk Melano-Sematan and another in Bintulu while the request for increase in oil royalty as well as contracts of the oil industry to be given to local or state-linked companies seemed to be getting attention from Petronas and the federal government,” he said, adding that with the committees being set up, hopefully there’s light at the end of the tunnel for the state to be given more empowerment from the federal government.

Abdul Karim also took the opportunity to make a playful jab at the opposition stating that they had been trying to jump on the ‘popularity bandwagon’ that Adenan has created.

“It cannot be denied that Our Right Honourable Chief Minister has been steadfast in his efforts to get back the rights that are rightfully ours and which have through the years been taken away or diminished from us and unfortunately the opposition has tried to jump on the bandwagon as (prior to this) we have not heard them talking about this.

“It is probably because the election is near and they might have run out of issues. This is the first time I’ve seen so many motions (from the opposition) practically related to the same subject matter which is on the state-federal relationship,” he said.

Coincidently, opposition members Chong Chieng Jen (DAP Kota Sentosa), David Wong (DAP Pelawan) and See Chee How (PKR Batu Lintang) also filed the same motion that contained the same subject matters to what Masing had tabled.

Source: The Borneo Post

All round nod for Masing’s motion

THE State Legislative Assembly yesterday unanimously approved a motion tabled by Land Development Minister Tan Sri Datuk Amar Dr James Masing who called on the state government to be fully committed in safeguarding the special interests of the state.

The motion also incorporates three other motions from Chong Chieng Jen (DAP Kota Sentosa), David Wong (DAP Pelawan) and See Chee How (PKR Batu Lintang) that contained the same subject matter to what Masing tabled.

Chong called for the appointment of a Special Select Committee to consider and review the terms of the Malaysia Agreement and the Ninth Schedule of the Federal Constitution on four areas, namely Education, Healthcare, Internal Security and Taxation, while Wong tabled a motion on the use of English as the official language of Sarawak.

The motion tabled by See was to call on the august House to preserve and uphold the territorial integrity of Sarawak and Rejection of Territorial Sea Act 2012 as well as on the setting up of a commission to look into the constitutional and legal framework for devolution of powers to Sarawak.

Prior to the passing of the motion tabled by Masing, it was debated and supported by Assistant Minister of Housing Datuk Abdul Karim Rahman Hamzah, Chong as well as See.

Masing, who is also Baleh assemblyman, proposed that the august House mandates the state government to take all measures and action under Article VIII of the Malaysia Agreement with the federal government to ensure the complete implementation of all the recommendations of the Inter-Governmental Committee (IGC) Report for the advancement and safeguard the special interests of the state and the peoples of Sarawak.

“We also called on the state government to realign federal policies on education, health and official language so that they are consistent with the constitutional safeguards and the terms of the IGC Report.”

He also called for a review of the grants and other revenues assigned to the state shall be initiated and the discharge of financial burdens by the federal government on subject matters in the Concurrent List and additional sources of revenues be made available to the state government to carry out its constitutional functions and responsibilities to the people.

“We propose for the delegation of federal functions and powers to the state to ensure the efficient and effective monitoring or supervision, and timely implementation, of federal works and infrastructural projects in the state or projects designed to improve the welfare of the rural communities.”

Masing called for a review of all legislations that affect the state’s rights to its natural resources of the exercise powers and functions in relation thereto, under the Federal Constitution, within its boundaries and upon such review, to amend or repeal such legislation.

Finally, he called for a review of those federal government’s decisions or policies which were found to be inconsistent with the aspirations of the people of the state as noted in the Cobbold Commission Report and the IGC Report at the time of the formation of Malaysia.

According to Masing, the state government was firmly committed to accelerate the economic and social progress made by the state since Malaysia Day to enable the state to reach the level of development of the states in Peninsular Malaysia and be part of a developed nation by 2020.

“The state government is also fully committed to safeguard the special interests of the state as enshrined in Part XIIA of the Federal Constitution, the executive and legislative powers vested in the state and the revenues assigned to the state under the Tenth Schedule of the Federal Constitutions; the terms of the Malaysia Agreement and the recommendations of the IGC Report.”

He also said the state government was desirous that the state shall continue to have the authorities vested in the state under the Federal Constitution and additional sources of revenues, and full and meaningful consultation on all decisions, actions, plans, programmes, projects and policies which affect or concern or impact the state and its peoples.

Masing said the state was firmly committed towards strengthening the relationship between the state and federal governments in order to realise the goals of accelerating economic and social progress in the state particularly in the rural areas and to improve the welfare and well being of all communities in the state.

“The continued progress and advancement of Sarawak and the respect for the constitutional safeguards and special interests of the state will promote and strengthen national unity and contribute towards a strong and prosperous Malaysia.”

In his winding up speech, he thanked all the elected representatives for supporting the motion, adding it was important for all of them to speak on the same page on ways to preserve Sarawak’s rights.

“I would like to thank the member for Batu Lintang who spoke on territorial rights. There are two Acts that are very important to us; one is Territorial Sea Act 2012 and Continental Shelf Act 1966,” he said, adding that the Petroleum Mining Act 1966 was also equally important that the state government would look into.

Source: The Borneo Post

Mahdzir Khalid: Sabah, Sarawak Tidak ada Tempat, Hanya Melayu Layak Memerintah

1. Mahdzir Khalid sekali lagi menimbulkan kenyataan kontroversi apabila berkata bahawa hanya bangsa Melayu dari Malaya yang layak memegang teraju pemerintahan negara ini dan mendominasi kuasa politik negara.

2. Menteri Pendidikan ini pernah mengeluarkan kenyataan kontroversi yang dikecam hebat apabila mengaitkan laporan Sarawak Report ke atas Najib Tun Razak sebagai usaha yang dirancang oleh agama Yahudi dan Kristian.

3. Kenyataan tidak bertanggungjawab menteri yang baru dilantik tersebut dilihat sangat berbahaya kerana melaga-lagakan bangsa dan penganut agama di negara ini yang boleh mencetuskan perbalahan kaum. Kenyataan ini adalah fitnah dan hasil karya Mahdzir sendiri yang tidak disokong oleh mana-mana bukti; namun sehingga sekarang tidak ada tindakan yang diambil ke atasnya.

4. Ini menyebabkan Mahdzir lebih berani bersuara lantang membelakangkan sumbangan kaum-kaum lain dalam proses pembentukan Malaysia. Mahdzir berkata: “UMNO lah yang membina negara ini dengan bantuan MCA dan MIC”

5. UMNO tidak membina negara Malaysia.

6. UMNO mungkin memberi sumbangan besar ketika Tanah Melayu menuju kepada proses kemerdekaan dari British tetapi bukan instrumental dalam pembentukan Malaysia. Malaysia terbentuk dengan penyertaan Sabah dan Sarawak sebagai negara-negara kongsi yang mempunyai taraf yang sama dengan Tanah Melayu pada ketika itu.

7. Kegagalan Madhzir memahami fakta sejarah ini bukan sahaja menunjukkan bahawa beliau tidak layak menjadi menteri tetapi tidak berhak bersuara membelakangkan sumbangan kaum-kaum lain. Apabila pelampau seperti ini dijadikan Menteri Pendidikan Malaysia, maka masa depan negara ini kelam dan ketegangan kaum bakal tercetus.

8. Keluasan tanah Sabah dan Sarawak adalah lebih besar daripada Malaya. Walaupun hanya 5.7 juta rakyat Malaysia tinggal di Sabah dan Sarawak berbanding 22.5 juta di Malaya, namun Malaysia tidak akan wujud di muka bumi ini tanpa Sabah dan Sarawak. Kekuatan maritim Malaysia tidak akan ke mana tanpa Malaysia timur, dan Malaysia tidak akan semaju hari ini tanpa Sabah & Sarawak.

9. Penduduk berbilang bangsa dan agama dari Sabah & Sarawak berjumlah 5.7 juta orang. Sementara orang Melayu dari Malaya berjumlah 9 juta orang. Bumiputera Sabah & Sarawak mempunyai hak yang sama dengan Melayu.

10. Persoalannya mengapa rakyat bumiputera Sabah & Sarawak harus bertuankan Melayu?

Perjanjian Malaysia 1963 mesti dilaksana sepenuhnya

BENTANG USUL: Masing ketika membentangkan usul pada Persidangan DUN semalam.

KUCHING: Dewan Undangan Negeri (DUN) semalam sebulat suara meluluskan usul agar kerajaan negeri diberi kuasa penuh untuk mengambil segala langkah dan tindakan melindungi hak dan kepentingan Sarawak dengan mendesak kerajaan pusat melaksanakan sepenuhnya Perjanjian Malaysia 1963.

Usul itu dibentang oleh Menteri Kemajuan Tanah Tan Sri Datuk Amar James Masing bersama empat lagi usul dikemukakan Chong Chieng Jen (DAP-Kota Sentosa), See Chee Haw (PKR-Batu Lintang) dan David Wong (DAP-Pelawan) kerana ia merangkumi perkara sama.

Masing ketika membaca usul itu berkata Artikel VII Perjanjian Malaysia 1963 memberi jaminan bahawa hak-hak kerajaan negeri akan dilindungi menerusi ‘semua pengesyoran dalam Laporan Jawatankuasa Antara Kerajaan (IGC) untuk menambah baik dan melindungi kepentingan-kepentingan istimewa negeri dan rakyat Sarawak’.

“Oleh itu, Dewan ini memberi mandat kepada kerajaan negeri melakukan rundingan dengan kerajaan persekutuan untuk menyemak serta menyusun semula dasar-dasar persekutuan dalam pendidikan, kesihatan dan bahasa rasmi.

“Semakan dan susunan semula itu penting supaya ia selaras dengan melindungi perlembagaan dan terma-terma Laporan IGC,” ujarnya.

Selain itu dengan lulusnya usul tersebut, mandat turut diberi kepada Ketua Menteri Datuk Patinggi Tan Sri Adenan Satem menyemak semula semua undang-undang persekutuan termasuk meminda atau memansuh undang-undang yang menjejaskan hak-hak Sarawak terhadap sumber aslinya.

Undang-undang yang terlibat ialah Akta Pelantar Benua 1966, Akta Laut Wilayah 2012 dan Akta Petroleum 1966.

Akta Laut Wilayah 2012 mengehadkan wilayah perairan Sarawak iaitu dalam lingkungan tiga batu nautika dari pantai manakala Akta Pelantar Benua 1966 dan Akta Petroleum 1996 boleh menjejaskan tuntutan kerajaan negeri untuk mendapatkan pendapatan daripada sumber petroleum.

“Semakan semula ini boleh juga  merangkumi keputusan dan dasar kerajaan persekutuan jika ia didapati tidak seiring dengan aspirasi rakyat Sarawak seperti ditulis dalam Laporan Suruhanjaya Cobbold dan Laporan IGC.

“Mandat ini juga boleh digunakan untuk memulakan kajian semula geran dan pendapatan lain yang diberikan kepada Sarawak,”ujarnya.

Sementara itu pada persidangan sama, Dewan menolak beberapa usul dibangkit pembangkang antaranya usul dikemukakan Baru Bian (PKR- Ba’Kelalan).

Baru mengemukakan usul agar kerajaan negeri melaksanakan dasar-dasar tetap untuk mencapai ‘Borneonisasi’ dan pembahagian perkhidmatan jawatan dalam sektor awam yang seimbang dalam kalangan etnik di Malaysia terutama 90 peratus rakyat Sarawak dalam sektor pendidikan dan jawatan pengarah serta timbalan pengarah jabatan kerajaan pusat menjelang 2018.

Selain itu Dewan turut menolak secara bertulis usul Baru yang mahu Biro Tata Negara (BTN) disemak semula.

Baru yang ditemui selepas itu memberitahu, antara alasan dikemukakan Speaker DUN Datuk Amar Mohd Asfia Awang Nassar menolak usul pertamanya ialah perkataan ‘Borneonisation’ tidak sesuai digunakan.

“Manakala usul berkaitan BTN, alasan ia ditolak ialah perkataan digunakan ketika membentangkan usul itu boleh mewujudkan perasaan niat jahat yang boleh menyebabkan permusuhan dalam kalangan berlainan kaum di Sarawak atau melanggar Perlembagaan Negeri Sarawak atau Perlembagaan Persekutuan atau Akta Hasutan 1948,” jelasnya.

Source: Utusan Borneo

Monday, 23 November 2015

SAPP wants Nurul Izzah barred from entering Sabah

The PKR vice-president has hurt the sensitivity of the Sabah people who had lost their loved ones during the intrusion by the Sulu sultan's soldiers in the state, says its president.

KOTA KINABALU: Sabah Progressive Party (SAPP) vice president Japiril Suhaimin wants the state government to bar PKR vice-president Nurul Izzah Anwar from entering Sabah following her meeting with princess Jacel Jamalul Kiram, the daughter of the Sulu Sultan.

Japiril said this in a Facebook posting following Nurul’s meeting with the princess who was the spokesperson for Sultan Kiram during the Lahad Datu armed intrusion by soldiers from the Sulu Sultanate in 2013.

“Nurul Izzah has hurt the sensitivity of the people of Sabah who had lost their loved ones during the intrusion by soldiers loyal to Jamalul Kiram during the armed battle with Malaysian security forces in Tanduo. Stop her from entering Sabah,” he said.

One comment received on Facebook urged all PKR reps in Sabah to stop supporting the party.

“If Nurul Izzah remains in contact with Princess Jacel, all reps in Sabah must quit PKR and don’t expect the people of Sabah to support the party,” said Mohd Norazman Injah.

“Say No to PKR,” said another posting on Facebook.

Several pictures of Nurul Izzah and Princess Jacel were uploaded in social media and have gone viral, drawing criticism.

Jambun: Seek point of law ruling on Nurul

Sabah, Sarawak and Malaya being together appear to be a Trust Arrangement under UN Resolution 1541 (XV) Principle IX.

KOTA KINABALU: Inspector General of Police Khalid Abu Bakar’s threat to bring “treason” charges against Lembah Pantai MP Nurul Izzah Anwar for appearing in a picture with Jacel Kiram of the defunct Sulu Sultanate is easier said than done, said a human rights activist in Sabah. He cautioned against stirring a hornet’s nest on Malaysia in Borneo. “The Lahad Datu intruders from Sulu, for one, claimed that they were promised land, by the authorities, in eastern Sabah. That’s already ‘treason’, from the Borneo perspective.”

“Besides, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) at the Hague did not allow Manila to be a party to its hearings on Sipadan (and Ligitan), thereby refusing to consider the so-called Sabah claim.”

Daniel John Jambun, who heads the UK-based Borneo’s Plight in Malaysia Foundation (Bopim), assumes that what Khalid probably means is that he will recommend, and that the Attorney General will bring, treason charges against Nurul.

In any case, added Daniel, perhaps AG Mohd Apandi Ali should first get a point of law ruling from the Federal Court, sitting as the Constitutional Court, on what the framers of the Federal Constitution meant by treason (and sedition) and whether they apply to Sabah and Sarawak. “Article 160 of the Federal Constitution defines Federation as the Malayan Federation.”

“Sabah and Sarawak never entered the Malayan Federation. They are not signatories to the Federation of Malaya Agreement 1948 and therefore do not come under the Federation of Malaya Independence Act of 1957.”

If Article 160 means that the Malayan Federation is the basis of the greater Malaysian Federation, argues Daniel, the question that arises is whether this greater Federation still remains the Malayan Federation with Sabah and Sarawak “incorporated” therein, knowingly or unknowingly, or whether the greater Federation is a Federation of Malaya (now known as Malaysia), Sabah (North Borneo) and Sarawak. “We can leave Singapore out of the equation since it actually merged with Malaya in 1963, Sabah and Sarawak facilitating the process, and besides it has since exited the merger.”

The point of law ruling is important, stressed Daniel, since the Malayan Government has been in non compliance on the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63), and related constitutional documents, the basis for Sabah and Sarawak to be in Federation with the peninsula (with or without Singapore).

Seeking the point of law ruling, continued Daniel, can also help decide whether treason charges can be brought based on the contents of the Royal Commission Inquiry (RCI) Report on the illegal immigrant phenomenon in Sabah and Jamalul Kiram turning up at the Umno General Assembly in 2012. “The jury is still out on whether Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak shaking hands recently with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu can be included as well in all the potential treason charges the AG has to consider.”

Indeed, in proceeding further he said, the 1MDB scandal and the RM2.6 billion political “donation” controversy can also be settled in Court through treason charges.

Daniel expressed confidence that the Constitutional Court would not be able to interpret the Federal Constitution as including Sabah and Sarawak within its ambit for treason or sedition. “The Court should not stop there, and in giving written grounds for its ruling, must touch on the constitutional issue of Malaya (now Malaysia) being in Borneo.”

If the Court finds that Sabah and Sarawak are members of the Malayan Federation (now Malaysian Federation), then Sabah and Sarawak would come within the ambit of the Federal Constitution on treason (and sedition), conceded Daniel.

Again, that would raise two constitutional issues.

Firstly, the Malayan/Malaysian Government’s non-compliance on MA63 and the related constitutional documents on Sabah and Sarawak being in Federation with the peninsula (with or without Singapore).

Secondly, said Daniel, it would raise the constitutional issue of the Intention of the Founding Fathers in Borneo on the 1963 Arrangements with Malaya, Singapore and the United Kingdom with or without the UN Secretary-General.

The bottomline, urged Daniel, is to exercise caution in Borneo, indeed not open Pandora’s Box, but instead put the past behind and proceed with Sarawak Chief Minister Adenan Satem’s push for Sabah and Sarawak to regain their full autonomy. “That’s the status that Sabah and Sarawak had in 1963 and in line with MA63.”

“The idea of Sabah, Sarawak and Malaya being together, with or without Federation, may not have been envisaged to be a permanent arrangement. It appears to be a Trust Arrangement under UN Resolution 1541 (XV) Principle IX.”

 
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...