Tuesday, 24 March 2015

Reply to - '' Right to secession not allowed under Malaysia Agreement, says Attorney-''

Refering toTan Sri Abdul Gani Patail report on Saturday , 24th January 2015 stated in TheStar/Asia News Network are as follow :

''Right to secession not allowed under Malaysia Agreement, says Attorney-''

It is only under Malaysia Governance but the fact AG responded to those calls is a VICTORY to us, in any ways. Sabah Sarawak Keluar Malaysia Facebook Group in the last 4 years time; we know that  we do make  the Government act like they are intoxicated.

The Prime Minister, Dato Sri Najib Tun Razak  had actually admitted that he  failed to uphold and respect Malaysia Agreement 1963; with reference to  Appendix I.

Appendix I:


The reason given by Lord Lansdowne was that “any State voluntarily entering a federation had an intrinsic right to secede at will, and that it was therefore unnecessary to include it in the Constitution”. Basically what it means here is that Sabah and Sarawak is free to form Malaysia, it is also therefore free to leave.

Sabah and Sarawak does not need the approval of each of the states to leave.  Sabah and Sarawak does not need the support of the Rulers Council to leave.

All Sabah and Sarawak need to do is to pass a resolution in their respective Dewan Undangan Negeri to leave after we have all the majority voices of numbers required by United Nation; Sabah and Sarawak will become a sovereign nation.

I hope the above explanation is sufficient to clear any confusion about th econtent and usage of terms pertaining to the Malaysia Agreement 1963.

From equal rights it is become to few rights and almost to no rights at all. Reference to Appendix 2.



f only referring to Seditious 1948 then what Sabah and Sarawak have in 1948 is in question. Refer to Appendix 3.

Appendix 3:


Reactions:

0 comments :

 
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...